POSTED ON AUGUST 31, 2011 BY ROBERT OSZAKIEWSKI
Denmark's Environmental Protection Agency (DEPA) recently released "Survey on basic knowledge about exposure and potential environmental and health risks for selected nanoparticles".
The survey was written by Sonja Hagen Mikkelsen, Erik Hansen and Trine Boe Christensen of COWI A/S, Anders Baun and Steffen Foss Hansen of DTU Environment and Mona-Lise Binderup of DTU Food, all working under contract with DEPA.
Noting that "There is no single source of information that provides an overview of nanomaterials and products in Denmark or in the EU for that matter",
DEPA has therefore initiated this project to provide an overview of the existing knowledge about seven of the most common nanomaterials, their environmental and health properties, the use of those nanomaterials and the possibility of exposure of humans and the environment.
The seven nanomaterials selected as the focus of the survey are
1 - Titanium dioxide
2 - Cerium dioxide
3- Fullerenes (aka carbon balls or 'buckeyballs")
4- Nanosilver
5- Zero-valent iron
6 - Silicium dioxide
7 - Nanoclay
These nanomaterials were selected based on
1- Application volums
2- Potential human exposure
3- Potential direct discharge into the environment
4 - Expected biological effect (human and/or environment), persistence or bioaccumultion
The authors of the survey developed "profiles" for the nanomaterials, focusing on " the general characteristics and manufacture of the nanomaterial, their current uses (mainly focused at consumer products) and hazard profiles (ecotoxicity and human toxicity) . . . . The profiles included sections discussing relevant exposures from consumer products and considerations regarding the related risk."
The first two chapters of the survey, "Introduction" and "Nanomaterials Survey" discuss the nature of the nanomaterials, their use in industries, general availability of products incorporating the nanomaterials and brief summaries of earlier studies.
Chapters 3-9 focus on the individual nanomaterials selected for this survey, discussing the general characteristics of a specific nanomaterial, how it is manufactured, which consumer products available in Denmark, either via a website or a bricks and mortor shop, review of toxicity studies, possible scenarios where humans and the environment might be exposed to the nanomaterials, ranging from disposal of products containing nanomaterials in landfills to the use of nanomaterial ensconced cosmetics, such as sunscreens containing titanium dioxide, and brief discussions of "risk profiles" for the selected nanomaterials.
Summary sheets are found at the end of the chapters.
Chapter 10, "Exposure and risk potential", raises a point that critics of this survey will note:
. . . the range of toxicological and ecotoxicological studies available is not sufficient to allow firm conclusions with regard to the toxicity of the nanoparticles compared to their bulk counterparts... (emphasis added)
As one might then expect, the authors of this survey come to the conclusion that, in order to answer the questions regarding nanomaterials and risk
Fonte: NanoLawReport
________________________________________________________________
Denmark's Environmental Protection Agency (DEPA) recently released "Survey on basic knowledge about exposure and potential environmental and health risks for selected nanoparticles".
The survey was written by Sonja Hagen Mikkelsen, Erik Hansen and Trine Boe Christensen of COWI A/S, Anders Baun and Steffen Foss Hansen of DTU Environment and Mona-Lise Binderup of DTU Food, all working under contract with DEPA.
Noting that "There is no single source of information that provides an overview of nanomaterials and products in Denmark or in the EU for that matter",
DEPA has therefore initiated this project to provide an overview of the existing knowledge about seven of the most common nanomaterials, their environmental and health properties, the use of those nanomaterials and the possibility of exposure of humans and the environment.
The seven nanomaterials selected as the focus of the survey are
1 - Titanium dioxide
2 - Cerium dioxide
3- Fullerenes (aka carbon balls or 'buckeyballs")
4- Nanosilver
5- Zero-valent iron
6 - Silicium dioxide
7 - Nanoclay
These nanomaterials were selected based on
1- Application volums
2- Potential human exposure
3- Potential direct discharge into the environment
4 - Expected biological effect (human and/or environment), persistence or bioaccumultion
The authors of the survey developed "profiles" for the nanomaterials, focusing on " the general characteristics and manufacture of the nanomaterial, their current uses (mainly focused at consumer products) and hazard profiles (ecotoxicity and human toxicity) . . . . The profiles included sections discussing relevant exposures from consumer products and considerations regarding the related risk."
The first two chapters of the survey, "Introduction" and "Nanomaterials Survey" discuss the nature of the nanomaterials, their use in industries, general availability of products incorporating the nanomaterials and brief summaries of earlier studies.
Chapters 3-9 focus on the individual nanomaterials selected for this survey, discussing the general characteristics of a specific nanomaterial, how it is manufactured, which consumer products available in Denmark, either via a website or a bricks and mortor shop, review of toxicity studies, possible scenarios where humans and the environment might be exposed to the nanomaterials, ranging from disposal of products containing nanomaterials in landfills to the use of nanomaterial ensconced cosmetics, such as sunscreens containing titanium dioxide, and brief discussions of "risk profiles" for the selected nanomaterials.
Summary sheets are found at the end of the chapters.
Chapter 10, "Exposure and risk potential", raises a point that critics of this survey will note:
. . . the range of toxicological and ecotoxicological studies available is not sufficient to allow firm conclusions with regard to the toxicity of the nanoparticles compared to their bulk counterparts... (emphasis added)
As one might then expect, the authors of this survey come to the conclusion that, in order to answer the questions regarding nanomaterials and risk
Fonte: NanoLawReport
________________________________________________________________
REFLEXÃO:
Fica notório e cada vez mais pacífico que engajamento público no que pertine aos desenvolveres nanotecnológicos são prementes. Muito se cria -- e ressalve-se que aqui no Brasil grande parte com verba pública --, se produz e está à disposição da ferocidade do mercado de consumo, produtos que com tecnologia nano. Sendo assim, o circuito das nanopatentes e conseguintes produtos destinados ao mercado se fecha e demanda tomada de decisões a posteriori. Todavia ínfima são as informações sobre os reais perigos da nanotecnologia.
Há estudos que indicam a toxicidade das nanopartículas, cujo tema já foi abordado em post's anteriores.
É necessário que o público esteja a par do que ocorre e que se inverta essa lógica gananciosa do lucro a qualquer preço em detrimento da saúde e cautela/precaução com os humanos e o meio ambiente.
Há estudos que indicam a toxicidade das nanopartículas, cujo tema já foi abordado em post's anteriores.
É necessário que o público esteja a par do que ocorre e que se inverta essa lógica gananciosa do lucro a qualquer preço em detrimento da saúde e cautela/precaução com os humanos e o meio ambiente.
Fica um vídeo para analisar o conceito criado por E. Drexler da "gosma cinzenta" (depois falarei mais sobre o tema).
